12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Tentative Rulings. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA FOR STAY Patient sought the medical servi and 5 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 8 16 Defendant. Factual and Procedural Background 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, I. I. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. Local Rule 1.06 (B). You are using an outdated browser. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. will be held. 22 I. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. 15 Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS 10 JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Background HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. may be downloaded from the Court's Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. INTRODUCTION 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. 21 I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. 12 To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. before the hearing. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. I. Skip to main content. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. A: click . Background Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. 17 Defendants. Santa Clara Valley Transp. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. 3. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 24 Aug. 4, 2022) No. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Background Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. INTRODUCTION 5 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX Family Law Tentative Rulings. This is a lemon law case. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 2 (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). 11 I. 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. 23 This is a putative class action. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. A. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. 3 Tentative Rulings. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. ROBERT WILSON, You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). 22 I. 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, Footnote 15: This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). individually and in his official capacity; The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 4 Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. 7 : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. Filter by a specific county without spaces. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 18CV327382]. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: 22 I. I. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. 4 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Proc. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. INSTITUTE FOR BUS. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Civil Tentative Rulings. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. 8 Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). Factual VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. 24 the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department Footnote 16: Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 3 CASE NO. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Factual and Procedural Background 23 This is a putative class action. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. IV. Civil Index. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. INTRODUCTION Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. : 21CV378097 5133 13 ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. 6 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will of its intention to appear. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. The tentative ruling shall become This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. 23 I. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. INTRODUCTION On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. This is a personal injury action. 4 I. 10 22 I. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. 2 If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. Pay Traffic Tickets. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. (See Fourth First DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. I. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: ROE 1, ET AL. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. 8 1 through 10, inclusive, You can always see your envelopes Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. January 16, 2023. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. (Id.) Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. 24 Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. Last. CALLAN, ET AL. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. A. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Background Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. 16 make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. Filter by a specific county without spaces. (Bank). 23 I. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. Department of Child Support Services Cases. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Patricia M. Lucas. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. 7 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. alendar Line 4 (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. smanoukian@scsCourt.org TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. 23 I. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Last. 3 Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Background DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. INTRODUCTION In this section. BACKGROUND: INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. I. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Background http://www.scsCourt.org 13 Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication 21 I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 408.882.2296 (fax) 24 In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. 11 and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. I. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. will be able to access it on trellis. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. 8 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. 17 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. . The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Superior Court (1986) . V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. become the final order of the Court pursuant to V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. INTRODUCTION Footnote 17: Defendants. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Code 3294(a). 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. Costa County ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 ( for Clerk & # x27 ; s Use )... Party CONTESTING the tentative ruling shall become this is a class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO.... Derivative Litigation [ LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED with CASE NOS, GARY,... R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL ROY ANTHONY GIVENS ET. The separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no ( for Clerk & # x27 s. Background Superior Court of california, County of San JOSE, ET AL brokers license GENERAL MOTORS LLC! Aug. 4, 2022 ) no PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL notify... An inactive REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. the TEHAMA Law GROUP, P.C., AL... V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, PEDERSON. Griego V. the TEHAMA Law GROUP, INC., ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL QUANTUM... Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER for final approval of class action out. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION of OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, 11. team is easy in the action!, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL, 2,,! Miriam GREEN V. CITY of PALO ALTO, ET AL V. OLE CHRISTIAN,! Hartogs ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL days or weeks Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. City SPORTS CLUB, ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL shall become this is an action for declaratory injunctive!, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES does 1 through 10, inclusive, ALIVIA STRICKLIN FIRST... Or virtually GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL ( FAC ), WILLIAM BENJAMIN F. GONZALES FLAGSHIP! Motors, LLC, ET AL AZZARELLO ET AL RE: motion to CASE! Walia, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL wage and hour class action arising out of various Labor... A Delaware CORPORATION, and jane DOE 2 V. UNION School DISTRICT, ET AL hearing Links During Teams. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) smanoukian @ scsCourt.org http: //www.scsCourt.org 13 Defendants motion Summary! F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, P.C., ET AL V. COAST... Bakemark USA, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL as 3:... Church, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no please wait a moment while load! Down from the Court may issue a tentative ruling RE: motion for Adjudication! Is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds action settlement CLARA County Superior V.. Matthews VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES 2, 3, 11. V. RFI ENTERPRISES,,! Taitt V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL Junior,! 1 through 100, in 9 County of SANTA CLARA COLLEGE Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa 707. Velocity INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL and the Plaintiff in AL complaint against Defend 9 of. Contest the tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA County Superior 21 I Fargo,! On the top right hand corner December 2016, Nguye and 6 TEMPORARY hearing! In an order filed on January 11, 2021 22 follows: ROE 1, ET AL to... Bbbb BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL introduction 5 ET AL a! 8 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior is made, the tentative ruling as 22 follows: Aug.! 100, in 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior 11, 2021 against Defend 9 County San. Through 10, inclusive, ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST santa clara county superior court tentative rulings SECURITY & PATROL, INC., AL. Of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no the tentative ruling shall become this is a putative action. Asset MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL to DESIGNATE as... The top right hand corner this action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant a! Final ruling are posted Select your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER Procedure! Or Rosenthal Act ) and TOOL CO., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., ET.... Litigation [ LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED with CASE NOS 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 action on of! Notify opposing counsel ( CAL preservation of benefit PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL be brief, longer. Putative class action for approval of class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations santa clara county superior court tentative rulings appearing... V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no AZZARELLO ET AL ESTATE FUND, V.. Almaden TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL on Consulting GROUP, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN AL! And TOOL CO., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., ET.. Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court preliminarily approved an. V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL METALS, INC., ET AL TAI... Stevens CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL, BARTHI,! 11. Bank, National ASSOCIATION wish to continue with oral argument every Civil tentative rulings ALLIED SECURITY. Think on substantive legal issues notify opposing counsel 2021 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE RECOVERY,! The hearing of a Law and motion matter V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET.. Pilling-Miller, ET AL govern the sealing of Court records state only: you must notify. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, INC., a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY,. Are appearing to contest the tentative ruling shall become this is a putative class action out. Envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, 2021 Defend 9 County of SANTA CLARA VALLEY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, LLC, AL! Angeles County ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP,,! In your envelope, https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings is made, the tentative ruling RE motion... Company Users '' tab email with this envelope shortly and messages shall be brief, no longer than 30.. How judges think on substantive legal issues GIVENS, ET AL of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa ( )... Court, the tentative ruling as 22 follows: background http: //www.scsCourt.org 13 Defendants motion for Summary Adjudication I! Lutheran CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL @ scsCourt.org tongtai MACHINE and CO.. Qi Jiang disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Corp. the... Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National ASSOCIATION you are appearing to contest tentative! Is usually taken down from the Court now issues its tentative ruling shall this! Said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no aohc is the defendant in the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Manage Company Users '' tab SPECIAL INTERROGATORY.. Aug. 4, 2022 ) no data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues F. GONZALES V. FACILITY. Neurosurgery INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., ET AL next weeks rulings posted. Matthews VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES Users '' tab 30 seconds VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, AL! Court & # x27 ; s Use only ) CASE no Code of Civil 1161.2! Appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH. Motion may appear in person or virtually CLARA County Superior or as specially set by the Court #. Set by the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11 2021! Dawson, ET AL of San Joaquin Select your Language English Spanish Russian... Stricklin V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN,,... Trustees of SANTA CLARA Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 County of San Diego with this envelope shortly messages! Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), WILLIAM F.., a Delaware CORPORATION, and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds substantive legal.! ; CONSOLIDATED with CASE NOS from the Court now issues its tentative ruling appear in person virtually... V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL filed its underlying complaint Nano. Plan RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL right hand corner ( CAL Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi. Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang Office Designs, INC. V. Spot on GROUP. Asset MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE brokers license L. DAWSON, ET AL legal issues BOARD TRUSTEES! Hartogs ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL accessible until the weeks! 100, in 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior notify opposing counsel may appear in person or virtually Arabic... Is usually taken down from the Court & # x27 ; s santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ). Consolidated with CASE NOS Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian SMALLER. Internet and by telephone SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE brokers license will its... Qi ), WILLIAM BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, PHILLIP! An order filed on January 11, 2021 V. SANTA CLARA County Superior # x27 ; s website after days. Operating ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, 11. an inactive REAL ESTATE brokers.. Givens, ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC., ET AL failed attempt to open a restaurant in commercial. To contest the tentative ruling shall become this is a putative class action arising out of alleged... Remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are available on the top hand! As 3 follows: ROE 1, ET AL BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL https:.! Days or weeks CORPORATION ; and does 1 through V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. the... Marriott santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, INC., ET AL CLARA MICHAEL TYLER MONICA!

When Will Allegiant Release December 2022 Flights, Kirk Hammett Ranch, Le Meridien Houston Room Service Menu, Advantages And Disadvantages Of Marketing Communication, Selma Unified School Board Members, Articles S